Ryzen 2600x it reach 4.2 Ghz on two cores which is all you need, while the other 4 cores + 12 threads can handle all the Chromes tabs you could ever want. On speed 5 though, where the CPU becomes the main issue, it goes to the lower 20s, dipping into the teens on heavy load, but I can still say that it's quite impressive, again considering what it's running on, and at least I can still call that playable, thankfully.ĭepends on your budget, i'll give a reasonable one: On pause, when the GPU is the bottleneck, it goes to around the 40fps mark, which is pretty amazing considering what it's working with.
How many people are playing hearts of iron 4 steam 1080p#
My very own toaster, a 2013 notebook with a i5 3337U and a GT 625m, still is able to run the game at 1080p well enough for what it's capable. PDX is quite funny, they seem to orient their engine towards budget builds, but he scalability sucks, and as a result the high end will be very much wasted on those games. That said, with a budget of $3k, I see no reason for you not to get a 1080ti, that's as future proof as it gets, and you'll be able to play pretty much anything out today in 4k.Īlso, for the monitor, on the high end usually the main debate is for either going with 144hz or 4k, but on PDX games you'll get much more milage from 4k, as it was said before, for the CPU bottleneck the game experiences even with the most powerful hardware, you probably won't ever see anything close to 144hz in HoI4. When playing in 4k, GPU should indeed become more of a requirement, I wouldn't expect it to do so well on integrated graphics or the lower end (meaning the likes of the 1030) anymore. I feel like that quite obvious, but I'll say it anyway.
0 kommentar(er)
